GB/T 40148-2021
Basic terminology of science and technology evaluation (English Version)
- Standard No.
- GB/T 40148-2021
- Language
- Chinese, Available in English version
- Release Date
- 2021
- Published By
- General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People‘s Republic of China
- Latest
- GB/T 40148-2021
- Introduction
Core Value and Positioning of the Standard
GB/T40148-2021, as the first national terminology standard in the field of science and technology assessment in my country, has established a standardization system containing 8 categories and 132 terms, providing a unified language specification for science and technology assessment activities. The standard is applicable to assessment work in scenarios such as scientific research project management, innovation platform construction, and transformation of scientific and technological achievements.
Analysis of Terminology Architecture
Terminology Category Number of Core Terms Typical Application Scenarios General Terms 4 items Definition of Evaluation Concepts and Establishment of Standards Evaluation Type Terms 22 items Science and Technology Policy/Plan/Project Evaluation Technical Method Terms 12 items Evaluation Tool Selection and Method Design
In-depth Analysis of Key Terms
3.2 Definition of Science and Technology Evaluation
The standard clearly defines science and technology evaluation as "professional evaluation and consulting activities for science and technology activities using standardized procedures and scientific methods", emphasizing the dual functions of evaluation in serving decision-making and resource allocation. Typical application cases include mid-term evaluation of major national science and technology projects and performance evaluation of national key laboratories.
4.7 Science and Technology Project Evaluation
Covering the evaluation types of the whole life cycle of the project:
- Pre-evaluation: focus on reviewing the rationality of the goals and technical feasibility
- In-process evaluation: monitor progress and phased results
- Post-evaluation: comprehensively evaluate the value of scientific and technological innovation and economic and social benefits
Guidelines for the Implementation of Evaluation Methods
7.10 Multi-indicator Comprehensive Evaluation Method
Note in actual operation:
- It is recommended to use the Hierarchy Analysis Process (AHP) to determine the indicator weights
- The proportion of quantitative indicators should be ≥60% to ensure objectivity
- A three-level indicator system needs to be established: primary dimension → secondary factor → tertiary observation point
Standard Implementation Recommendations
It is recommended that the assessment agency establish the following working mechanisms:
- Terminology comparison table: mapping relationship between internal documents and standard terms
- Method toolbox: recommended methods for matching standards for different types of assessments
- Quality checklist: design control nodes based on 5.14 assessment quality requirements
GB/T 40148-2021 history
- 2021 GB/T 40148-2021 Basic terminology of science and technology evaluation
