According to the definition in Chapter 4 of the standard, the cybersecurity knowledge acquisition system adopts a five-layer processing architecture: data input layer → knowledge extraction layer → entity linking layer → knowledge deduction layer → verification and update layer. The system needs to support multi-source input of structured data (such as vulnerability libraries), semi-structured data (forum posts) and unstructured data (technical reports), and realize the dynamic evolution of the knowledge system through the knowledge graph construction engine.
| Functional Modules | Key Technologies | Confidence Requirements | Typical Application Scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Extraction | Named Entity Recognition, Dependency Syntax Analysis | Original Evidence Needs to be Provided | CVE Vulnerability Description Parsing |
| Entity Linking | Candidate Set Generation, Disambiguation Algorithm | Similarity Threshold ≥ 0.7 | Attack Tool Alias Normalization |
| Knowledge Deduction | Rule reasoning, credibility scoring | Score ≥ 0.8 can be stored | APT attack chain prediction |
Appendix A.1 of the standard stipulates that the request parameters must include docType (data type identifier) and textData (cleaned text). The response parameter adopts a triple structure, in which the score field requires the confidence to be accurate to two decimal places, for example:
{ "subjectName": "Heartbleed", "predicateName": "Affected component", "objectName": "OpenSSL", "score": 0.92 } Compared with international standards ISO/IEC 27005, the innovation of this standard is: for the first time, it clarifies the closed-loop process of cybersecurity knowledge acquisition (extraction → linking → deduction → verification → updating), and defines quantitative evaluation indicators for each link. In the future, attention should be paid to the adaptability update of technologies such as knowledge federation learning and multimodal data fusion.

Copyright ©2026 All Rights Reserved
Update:
Wed, 03 Jun 2026 06:31:09 +0000