As my country's first mandatory industry standard for production safety accident emergency rescue assessment, AQ 9012-2023 has constructed a complete technical framework including 4 basic requirements, 5 assessment methods, 3-stage procedures, and 7 types of assessment contents. Its outstanding features are reflected in:
| Technical dimension | Traditional practice | Innovation of this standard |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation object | Focus on the accident unit | Dual-subject evaluation (accident unit + government department) |
| Type of evidence | Mainly written materials | 8 types of evidence systems (including audio, video, physical evidence, etc.) |
| Evaluation method | Qualitative analysis | Five-dimensional technical verification (including technical appraisal) |
Explicitly require simultaneous assessment of the accident unit and the government rescue system, of which the government-side assessment covers 11 key departments (emergency, public security, health, etc.), forming a closed loop of responsibility.
It is required to prepare standardized interrogation records, focusing on collecting three types of information: ① emergency decision-making process ② resource scheduling timeliness ③ on-site command connection, and the interview objects should cover the decision-making level, the execution level and the affected parties.
Typical case: In a chemical enterprise leakage accident, by comparing the enterprise alarm records and the government alarm receiving timestamp, the response delay was accurately calculated to be 47 minutes, exposing the defects of the information reporting mechanism.
For the easily lost evidence on the scene (such as gas concentration data), the standard requires the use of a two-person witness + real-time upload mechanism, and it is recommended to equip anti-tampering recording equipment.
The assessment table designed with reference to Appendix A contains 23 cross-validation points, such as comparing the enterprise emergency drill records with the government filing system data.
| Phase | Key points on the enterprise side | Key points on the government side |
|---|---|---|
| Early warning stage | Effectiveness of monitoring system | Sensitivity of information reception |
| Disposal stage | Compliance of early disposal | Degree of connection of command system |
Compared with previous practices, this standard presents three major breakthroughs: ①Establishing quantitative evaluation indicators ②Introducing technical identification methods ③Clarifying the index of accountability clauses. The next step may be to connect with the ISO 45001 system to promote the internationalization of emergency rescue assessment.

Copyright ©2026 All Rights Reserved
Update:
Thu, 07 May 2026 13:02:21 +0000